Quality corner: Safely using cephalosporins in almost all patients with penicillin allergies: Mini-review and suggested protocol to improve efficacy and surgical outcomes.

Surgical site infections (SSI) are one of the most common gynecologic oncology postoperative complications and they have a significant deleterious impact on the healthcare system and in patients' outcomes. Cefazolin is the recommended antibiotic in women undergoing gynecologic surgical procedures that require that require prophylaxis. However, 10-20% of patients may report a penicillin allergy which can result in administration of a less effective antibiotic. This quality review evaluated the literature around this common perioperative issue and demonstrated that healthcare teams should consider the implementation of a protocol to safely use cefazolin in most patients with a penicillin allergy. Overall, literature shows this is a safe adjustment and would improve antimicrobial stewardship, decrease SSI rates, avoid acute kidney injury, and increase cost savings.

Preoperative preparation and postoperative care in children in thoracic surgery.

Anesthesia for pediatric patients undergoing thoracic surgery continues to be distinctive due to differing anatomical and physiological characteristics compared to adults. Adequate preoperative preparation, appropriate tool selection for providing one-lung ventilation, perioperative pain management, and a multidisciplinary approach can ensure higher quality postoperative care. In this review, the perioperative anesthesia management for pediatric patients undergoing thoracic surgery will be discussed, starting from the preoperative preparation phase. Additionally, the issues related to the application and management of one-lung ventilation will also be assessed.

Effect of chewing gum in reducing postoperative ileus after gastroduodenal perforation peritonitis surgery: A prospective randomised controlled trial.

Chewing gum reduces the duration of postoperative ileus and early recovery of bowel function following elective abdominal surgery. However, its role has not been studied in cases of gastroduodenal perforation peritonitis, prompting us to conduct this study. Patients were randomised into two groups, 39 patients received chewing gum (study group) and 43 patients were in the control group. Sensation of hunger, appearance of first bowel sound, and passages of flatus and faeces were significantly early in the study group; their hospital stay was also shorter. Chewing gum reduces the duration of postoperative ileus in cases of gastroduodenal perforation peritonitis.Registration number: IEC/2020-23/3359 dated 13 December 2020, Institutional Ethics Committee, Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose Medical College, Jabalpur, India.

Is Incentive Spirometry Superior to Standard Care in Postoperative Cardiac Surgery on Clinical Outcomes and Length of Hospital and Intensive Care Unit Stay? A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiac surgery is a frequent surgical procedure and may present a high risk of complications. Among the prophylactic strategies studied to decrease the rates of negative outcomes, respiratory care seems to reduce pulmonary complications. Incentive spirometry (IS) is a low-cost, respiratory exercise technique, used for the prevention and treatment of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC). The aim of this review was to evaluate whether IS is superior to respiratory care, mobilization exercises, and noninvasive ventilation on PPC, and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Systematic review. Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (or MEDLINE®), Embase®, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (or CENTRAL), Physiotherapy Evidence Database (or PEDro), Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health (or CINAHL®), Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (or LILACS), Scientific Electronic Library Online (or SciELO), Allied, Scopus®, and OpenGrey databases, clinical trial registration sites, conferences, congresses, and symposiums were searched. RESULTS: Twenty-one randomized trials and one quasi-randomized trial (1,677 participants) were included. For partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), IS was inferior to respiratory care (mean difference [MD] -4.48; 95% confidence interval [CI] -8.32 to -0.63). Flow-oriented IS was inferior to respiratory care on PaO2 (MD -4.53; 95% CI -8.88 to -0.18). However, compared to respiratory care, flow-oriented IS was superior on recovery vital capacity. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis revealed that IS was not superior to standard respiratory care for PPCs and clinical outcomes, therefore its use should not be widely recommended until further studies with high quality be performed to ensure this clinical guidance.

Delayed Postoperative Intracerebral Hemorrhage Associated With Oral Multikinase Inhibitor Therapy for Cancer: A Case Report.

Regorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGF) activity used as an antiangiogenic agent for metastatic colorectal cancer treatment and has been studied as a potential therapeutic agent for several other cancer treatments. Adverse reactions commonly reported with the use of regorafenib and similar oral multikinase inhibitors include hemorrhage, gastrointestinal fistulas, hypertension, and incomplete wound healing. We report a case of a 59-year-old man with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma post-colostomy on regorafenib treatment presenting to the emergency department with altered mental status. MRI showed a left frontoparietal mass, which was resected with a left frontal craniotomy. Postoperative MRI showed a resection cavity without significant hemorrhage. He had been prescribed regorafenib preceding his hospitalization, which was continued after admission before surgery and on postoperative day 1. Thirty-two hours after surgery, the patient exhibited sudden right-sided facial droop and right arm weakness. Imaging revealed an acute intraparenchymal hemorrhage within and adjacent to the tumor resection bed, which was managed conservatively. The patient was subsequently discharged to an inpatient rehabilitation facility. The unusual timing of the hemorrhage suggests that the hemorrhage was due to adverse effects of regorafenib. Patients undergoing neurosurgery should have regorafenib discontinued in preparation for surgery. Similar management should be considered for other anti-VEGF medications to avoid serious complications.

Partnering With Technology: Advancing Laparoscopy With Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning.

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have emerged as transformative technologies in optimizing laparoscopic surgery, offering innovative solutions to enhance surgical precision, efficiency, and safety. This editorial explores the potential role of AI/ML across the surgical continuum, including preoperative optimization, intraoperative assistance, and postoperative care. It outlines the benefits of laparoscopic surgery compared to traditional open procedures and identifies current challenges such as technical difficulty and human error. The editorial discusses how AI and ML technologies can address these challenges, including patient selection and risk stratification, surgical planning and simulation, and personalized medicine approaches. Moreover, it examines the role of AI/ML in intraoperative assistance, such as instrument tracking and guidance, real-time tissue analysis, and the detection of potential complications. Postoperative care and follow-up are also explored, highlighting the potential of AI/ML in monitoring patient recovery, predicting and preventing complications, and tailoring rehabilitation plans. Ethical concerns surrounding data privacy and security, the lack of transparency in decision-making, potential job displacement, and regulatory frameworks are discussed as challenges to the widespread adoption of AI/ML in laparoscopic surgery. Finally, potential areas for further research and exploration are outlined, emphasizing interdisciplinary collaboration and the need for transparent and accountable AI systems. Overall, this editorial provides insights into the challenges and opportunities in harnessing AI/ML technologies to optimize laparoscopic surgery and improve patient outcomes.

Surgical Patients' Evaluation of Pain Management Quality and Surgical Nurses' Pain-Related Knowledge and Attitudes.

PURPOSE: The present study was aimed at investigating the quality of pain management evaluated by inpatients in surgical clinics, and pain-related knowledge and attitudes of nurses working in surgical clinics, surgical units, or emergency services. METHODS: The study was conducted as a descriptive and cross-sectional study. The study data were collected from inpatients in surgical clinics (N = 306), and from nurses working in surgical clinics, surgical units, or emergency services (N = 57) between January 2020 and September 2020. The Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R) and Nurses' Knowledge and Attitudes Survey Regarding Pain (NKASRP) were the tools used for data collection. RESULTS: The mean scores the participants obtained from the severity of worst pain, pain relief, and satisfaction with pain treatment components of the APS-POQ-R were 6.14 ± 2.59, 59.28 ± 22.26, and 8.99 ± 1.62, respectively. There were significant differences between many components of the APS-POQ-R in terms of such variables as age, sex, undergoing previous surgery, presence of pain before surgery, surgery performed, and type of anesthesia (p < .05). The mean score the participants obtained from the NKASRP was 15.35 ± 3.87. CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that the patients' pain was relieved moderately, that they were very highly satisfied with pain treatment, and that the nurses' pain-related knowledge and attitude levels were below the moderate level. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Nurses should support patients whose in-bed activities were prevented due to pain, involve them in pain treatment decisions, advise them about pain treatment options, and encourage them to use nonpharmacological methods.

Evaluating the efficacy of standardized pressure ulcer management protocols in the prevention of pressure injuries among patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures.

Pressure injuries are a significant concern for patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures due to prolonged immobility and the complexity of care. This study evaluates the efficacy of standardized pressure ulcer management protocols in preventing pressure injuries and enhancing patient care in a neurosurgical context. A comprehensive retrospective analysis was conducted at a single institution from December 2020 to December 2023, comparing 50 patients who received standardized pressure ulcer management (intervention group) with 50 patients who received conventional care (control group). The study assessed the incidence of pressure ulcers, patient comfort levels using the Kolcaba Comfort Scale and sleep quality using the Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software, version 27.0, applying t-tests and chi-square tests as appropriate. The intervention group exhibited a significantly lower incidence of pressure ulcers at all measured time points post-surgery compared to the control group. Patient comfort levels in the intervention group were consistently higher across psychological, environmental, physiological and socio-cultural domains. Sleep quality metrics, including sleep depth, latency to sleep onset and overall sleep quality, were significantly improved in the intervention group. The implementation of standardized pressure ulcer management protocols in neurosurgical care significantly reduces the incidence of pressure injuries, enhances patient comfort and improves sleep quality. These findings highlight the importance of adopting structured care protocols to improve postoperative outcomes and patient well-being in neurosurgical settings.

Enhancing Postoperative Cochlear Implant Care With ChatGPT-4: A Study on Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Assisted Patient Education and Support.

BACKGROUND: Cochlear implantation is a critical surgical intervention for patients with severe hearing loss. Postoperative care is essential for successful rehabilitation, yet access to timely medical advice can be challenging, especially in remote or resource-limited settings. Integrating advanced artificial intelligence (AI) tools like Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT)-4 in post-surgical care could bridge the patient education and support gap. AIM: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of ChatGPT-4 as a supplementary information resource for postoperative cochlear implant patients. The focus was on evaluating the AI chatbot's ability to provide accurate, clear, and relevant information, particularly in scenarios where access to healthcare professionals is limited. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five common postoperative questions related to cochlear implant care were posed to ChatGPT-4. The AI chatbot's responses were analyzed for accuracy, response time, clarity, and relevance. The aim was to determine whether ChatGPT-4 could serve as a reliable source of information for patients in need, especially if the patients could not reach out to the hospital or the specialists at that moment. RESULTS: ChatGPT-4 provided responses aligned with current medical guidelines, demonstrating accuracy and relevance. The AI chatbot responded to each query within seconds, indicating its potential as a timely resource. Additionally, the responses were clear and understandable, making complex medical information accessible to non-medical audiences. These findings suggest that ChatGPT-4 could effectively supplement traditional patient education, providing valuable support in postoperative care. CONCLUSION: The study concluded that ChatGPT-4 has significant potential as a supportive tool for cochlear implant patients post surgery. While it cannot replace professional medical advice, ChatGPT-4 can provide immediate, accessible, and understandable information, which is particularly beneficial in special moments. This underscores the utility of AI in enhancing patient care and supporting cochlear implantation.

Impact of early rehabilitation therapy on functional outcomes in patients post distal radius fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: This meta-analysis aims to investigate the efficacy of early rehabilitation on patients who have undergone surgery for distal radius fractures (DRFs) with palmar plating, focusing on multiple outcome measures including upper limb function, wrist function, back extension mobility, pain levels, and complications. METHODS: A rigorous search strategy adhering to the PRISMA guidelines was employed across four major databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Studies were included based on stringent criteria, and data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers. Meta-analysis was conducted employing both fixed-effect and random-effects models as dictated by heterogeneity, assessed by the I2 statistic and chi-square tests. A total of 7 studies, encompassing diverse demographic groups and timelines, were included for the final analysis. RESULTS: The meta-analysis disclosed that early rehabilitation yielded a statistically significant improvement in upper limb function (SMD -0.27; 95% CI -0.48 to -0.07; P < 0.0001) and back extension mobility (SMD 0.26; 95% CI 0.04 to 0.48; P = 0.021). A notable reduction in pain levels was observed in the early rehabilitation group (SMD -0.28; 95% CI -0.53 to -0.02; P = 0.03). However, there were no significant differences in wrist function (SMD -0.13; 95% CI -0.38 to 0.12; P = 0.36) and complications (OR 0.99; 95% CI 0.61 to 1.61; P = 0.96). CONCLUSIONS: Early rehabilitation post-DRF surgery with palmar plating has been found to be beneficial in enhancing upper limb functionality and back extension mobility, and in reducing pain levels. Nevertheless, no significant impact was observed regarding wrist function and complications.

Patient Perspectives on Communication Pathways After Orthopedic Surgery and Discharge and Evaluation of Team-Based Digital Communication: Qualitative Exploratory Study.

BACKGROUND: The transition from hospital to home after orthopedic surgery requires smooth communication and coordination between patients and their team of care to avoid fragmented care pathways. Digital communication is increasingly being used to facilitate easy and accessible asynchronous communication between patients and health care professionals across settings. A team-based approach to digital communication may provide optimized quality of care in the postoperative period following orthopedic surgery and hospital discharge. OBJECTIVE: This study was divided into two phases that aimed to (1) explore the perspectives of patients undergoing orthopedic surgery on current communication pathways at a tertiary hospital in Denmark and (2) test and explore patients' experiences and use of team-based digital communication following hospital discharge (eDialogue). METHODS: A triangulation of qualitative data collection techniques was applied: document analysis, participant observations (n=16 hours), semistructured interviews with patients before (n=31) and after (n=24) their access to eDialogue, and exploration of use data. RESULTS: Findings show that patients experience difficult communication pathways after hospital discharge and a lack of information due to inadequate coordination of care. eDialogue was used by 84% (26/31) of the patients, and they suggested that it provided a sense of security, coherence, and proximity in the aftercare rearranging communication pathways for the better. Specific drivers and barriers to use were identified, and these call for further exploration of eDialogue. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, patients evaluated eDialogue positively and suggested that it could support them after returning home following orthopedic surgery.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Oncological Surgeries: CORONAL Study.

BACKGROUND: The impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on postoperative recovery from oncology surgeries should be understood for the clinical decision-making. Therefore, this study was designed to evaluate the postoperative cumulative 28-day mortality and the morbidity of surgical oncology patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients consecutively admitted to intensive care units (ICU) of three centres for postoperative care of oncologic surgeries between March to June 2019 (first phase) and March to June 2020 (second phase). The primary outcome was cumulative 28-day postoperative mortality. Secondary outcomes were postoperative organic dysfunction and the incidence of clinical complications. Because of the possibility of imbalance between groups, adjusted analyses were performed: Cox proportional hazards model (primary outcome) and multiple logistic regression model (secondary outcomes). RESULTS: After screening 328 patients, 291 were included. The proportional hazard of cumulative 28-day mortality was higher in the second phase than that in the first phase in the Cox model, with the adjusted hazard ratio of 4.35 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.15-8.82). The adjusted incidences of respiratory complications (odds ratio [OR] 5.35; 95% CI 1.42-20.11) and pulmonary infections (OR 1.53; 95% CI 1.08-2.17) were higher in the second phase. However, the adjusted incidence of other infections was lower in the second phase (OR 0.78; 95% CI 0.67-0.91). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical oncology patients who underwent postoperative care in the intensive care unit during the COVID-19 pandemic had higher hazard of 28-day mortality. Furthermore, these patients had higher odds of respiratory complications and pulmonary infections. Trials registration The study is registered in the Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials under the code RBR-8ygjpqm, UTN code U1111-1293-5414.

Health Care Professionals' Perspectives Before and After Use of eDialogue for Team-Based Digital Communication Across Settings: Qualitative Study.

BACKGROUND: Orthopedic surgical treatment is a transversal task that requires the active involvement of patients, relatives, and health care professionals (HCPs) across various settings. However, after hospital discharge, communication is challenged and undertaken primarily by phone. New digital communication solutions have the potential to create a space for seamless and patient-centered dialogue across discipline and sector boundaries. When evaluating new communication solutions, knowledge about HCPs' needs and perspectives of use must be explored, as it is they who are responsible for implementing changes in practice. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to (1) investigate HCPs' perceptions of current communication pathways (phase 1) and (2) explore their experiences of using a simple messenger-like solution (eDialogue) for team-based digital communication across settings (phase 2). METHODS: We used a triangulation of qualitative data collection techniques, including document analysis, observations, focus groups, and individual interviews of HCPs before (n=28) and after (n=12) their use of eDialogue. Data collection and analysis were inspired by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to specifically understand facilitators and barriers to implementation as perceived by HCPs. RESULTS: HCPs perceive current communication pathways as insufficient for both patients and themselves. Phone calls are disruptive, and there is a lack of direct communication modalities when communication crosses sector boundaries. HCPs experienced the use of eDialogue as a quick and easy way for timely interdisciplinary interaction with patients and other HCPs across settings; however, concerns were raised about time consumption. CONCLUSIONS: eDialogue can provide needed support for interdisciplinary and cross-sectoral patient-centered communication. However, future studies of this solution should address its impact and the use of resources.

Continuous Glucose Monitoring System After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Feasibility Study.

BACKGROUND: Blood glucose level variability has been associated with increased risk of complication in the postoperative setting of cardiovascular surgery. Although interesting for optimization of blood glucose management in this context, continuous blood glucose (CBG) devices can have a limited reliability in this context, in particular because of the use of paracetamol. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of Dexcom G6®, a recently developed continuous glucose monitoring device. METHODS: We performed a prospective, observational, non-randomized, single-centre study comparing Dexcom G6® CBG level monitoring with the standard methods routinely used in this context. The standard blood glucose values were paired to the time corresponding values measured with Dexcom G6®. Agreement between the two methods and potential correlation in case of paracetamol use were calculated. RESULTS: From May 2020 to August 2021, 36 out of 206 patients operated for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting were enrolled; 673 paired blood glucose level were analyzed. Global agreement (ρc) was 0.85 (95% C.I.: 0.84-0.86), intensive care unit agreement was 0.78 (95%C.I.: 0.74-0.82) and ward agreement was 0.91 (95%C.I.: 0.89-0.93). In the diabetic population, it was 0.87 (95%C.I.: 0.85-0.90). When paracetamol was used, the difference was 0.02 mmol/l (95%C.I.: 0.29-0.33). CONCLUSIONS: Dexcom G6® provides good blood glucose level accuracy in the postoperative context of cardiac surgery compared to the standard methods of measurements. The results are particularly reliable in the ward where the need for repeated capillary glucose measurements implies patient discomfort and time-consuming manipulations for the nursing staff.

A closed surgical intensive care unit organization improves cardiac surgical patient outcomes.

Background: Intensive care unit (ICU) organization is a critical factor in optimizing patient outcomes. ICU organization can be divided into "OPEN" (O) and "CLOSED" (C) models, where the specialist or intensivist, respectively, assumes the role of primary physician. Recent studies support improved outcomes in closed ICUs, however, most of the available data is centered on ICUs generally or on subspecialty surgical patients in the setting of a subspecialized surgical intensive care unit (SICU). We examined the impact of closing a general SICU on patient outcomes following cardiac and ascending aortic surgery. Methods: A retrospective cohort of patients following cardiac or ascending aortic surgery by median sternotomy was examined at a single academic medical center one year prior and one year after implementation of a closed SICU model. Patients were divided into "OPEN" (O; n=53) and "CLOSED" (C; n=73) cohorts. Results: Cohorts were comparable in terms of age, race, and number of comorbid conditions. A significant difference in male gender (O: 60.4% vs. C: 76.7%, P=0.049), multiple procedure performed (O: 13.21% vs. C: 35.62%, P=0.019), and hospital readmission rates was detected (O: 39.6% vs. C: 9.6%, P=0.0003). Using a linear regression model, a closed model SICU organization decreased SICU length of stay (LOS). Using a multivariate logistic regression, being treated in a closed ICU decreased a patient's likelihood of having an ICU LOS greater than 48 hours. Conclusions: Our study identified a decreased ICU LOS and hospital readmission in cardiac and ascending aortic patients in a closed general SICU despite increased procedure complexity. Further study is needed to clarify the effects on surgical complications and hospital charges.

Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of acute kidney injury in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy - A prospective observational exploratory study.

Background and Aims: Acute kidney injury (AKI) can occur in post-laparotomy patients, with a variable incidence. This study aimed to determine the incidence of AKI in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy under general anaesthesia, the effect of preoperative variables on the development of AKI, and the association of post-operative AKI with patient outcomes. Methods: This prospective exploratory study in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy was followed up for 7 days to determine the incidence of post-operative AKI. We determined the patients developing different severity of AKI based on kidney disease improving global outcome staging. Fisher's exact test or Chi-squared test was used to study the association of demographic variables, and various periopertaive variables on the development of postoperative AKI. The association of AKI with the duration of hospital stay was estimated using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U Test, and Fisher's exact test was used to study the association between AKI and mortality. Results: No patient had AKI in the pre-operative period. On day 3, 18 patients; on day 5, 28 patients; and on day 7, 24 patients developed AKI. Overall, a maximum of 33 patients (out of 100) developed AKI at any time. Our study found that the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) IV and sepsis were independent risk factors for post-operative AKI. Our results also show a moderate-to-high independent association between AKI and duration of hospital stay and mortality (within 30 days). Conclusion: Incidence of post-operative AKI following emergency laparotomy was 33%. Higher preoperative ASA physical status and sepsis were significantly associated with postoperative AKI development.

Single-shot liposomal bupivacaine in place of rectus sheath catheters to provide non-opiate analgesia after laparotomy: a quality improvement project to reduce the need for ongoing nursing input.

Opioid-sparing pain management is an integral component of enhanced recovery after colonic and rectal surgery. In our hospital, rectus sheath catheters (RSCs) are routinely placed during emergency laparotomy for colorectal procedures to allow a postoperative compartmental block of the surgical site with repeated doses of bupivacaine. However, RSCs require a significant amount of clinical nursing time to maintain and 'top-up'. We present a quality improvement project in which we administered single-shot liposomal bupivacaine (LB) intraoperatively as an alternative to bolus doses of conventional bupivacaine delivered through RSCs. Having thereby reduced the demands placed on nursing time through a reduction in the use of RSCs, we sought to establish whether there was any associated change in analgesic efficacy. Patient pain scores, use of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and length of stay following surgery were analysed before and after the introduction of LB. No disruption in these outcomes was identified using statistical process control analysis. A direct comparison of results for patients who received LB versus those who received bolus dosing of bupivacaine via RSCs found no significant differences, with a median total PCA dose of 270 mg oral morphine equivalents (OME) for patients who received LB versus 396 mg OME for patients who had RSCs (p=0.54). The median length of stay for patients who received LB was 15.5 days versus 16 days for those who had RSCs (p=0.87). We conclude that LB represents a viable alternative to boluses of conventional bupivacaine via RSCs in promoting enhanced recovery after emergency laparotomy and look to extend its use locally.

Critical Illness-Related Corticosteroid Insufficiency (CIRCI) After Pediatric Cardiac Surgery.

Although current studies do not support the routine use of corticosteroids after cardiopulmonary bypass in pediatric patients, there is incomplete understanding of the potential hemodynamic contribution of postoperative critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency in the intensive care unit. By reviewing the available studies and underlying pathophysiology of these phenomena in critically ill neonates, we can identify a subset of patients that may benefit from optimal diagnosis and treatment of receiving postoperative steroids. A suggested algorithm used at our institution is provided as a guideline for treatment of this high-risk population.

The Effect of Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) and Nursing Guide Application on Postoperative Patient Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to determine the effect of nursing guide application (NGA) on patient outcomes in patients followed up according to the modified early warning score (MEWS) in the postoperative period. DESIGN: A randomized controlled clinical trial. METHODS: The sample of the study consisted of 252 patients who underwent surgical intervention under general anesthesia in a university hospital between July 29, 2022, and October 31, 2022. FINDINGS: Results showed that the development of complications was less in the study group (SG) compared to the control group (CG) during anesthesia (P = .027), in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) (P = .017), and in the clinic (P = .001). It was found that the duration of stay in PACU in the CG was significantly shorter than in the study group (P < .001), and as the duration of stay in PACU in CG decreased, the MEWS increased (r = -0.201, P = .024). We found that there were fewer patients transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU) after PACU (P = .007), the MEWS was lower, and the number of nursing interventions applied to patients was higher (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients followed up according to MEWS, NGA had a positive effect on preventing the development of complications and shortening the intervention time for complications, decreasing ICU admission, decreasing MEWS and increasing the number of nursing interventions. Based on the results, it may be recommended to use MEWS+NGA in the early postoperative period as it positively affects patient outcomes.

Impact of mastectomy flap necrosis on prepectoral reconstructive outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: As reconstructive surgeons have increasingly transitioned to the prepectoral plane for prosthetic breast reconstruction, the implications of mastectomy skin flap necrosis have become more concerning. Our goal was to evaluate the effect of skin flap necrosis on reconstructive outcomes in patients undergoing immediate prepectoral breast reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of patients undergoing immediate two-stage prepectoral reconstruction at a single center with at least 3 months follow-up. Postoperative complications, reconstructive outcome, and time to final implant were compared between patients with and without mastectomy skin necrosis. RESULTS: A total of 301 patients underwent 509 prepectoral breast reconstructions. Forty-four patients (14.6%) experienced postoperative mastectomy skin flap necrosis. Demographic and reconstructive characteristics were similar between the necrosis and no necrosis cohorts. Patients with skin necrosis were more likely to undergo reoperation after tissue expander (64% vs 19%, p < 0.01) and undergo expander replacement (13.6% vs 3.5%, p = 0.02). However, rates of reconstructive failure (6.8% vs 6.2%), major infection (9.1% vs 9.0%), and minor infection (13.6% vs 17.5%) after expander placement were statistically similar. Patients with skin necrosis trended toward longer time before final implant placement, although the difference was not statistically significant (6.5 vs 5.0 months, p = 0.08). There was no difference in complication rates between the necrosis and no necrosis cohort after final implant placement. There was a higher rate of revision surgery after implant placement in the necrosis cohort (12.5% vs 4.1%, p = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: Mastectomy skin flap necrosis is a concerning postoperative event, particularly in patients with prepectoral prostheses. We observed that patients with skin necrosis experience higher reoperation rates in the expander period, yet have similar infection rates and achieve similar final reconstructive outcomes compared to patients without necrosis.